[erlang-questions] the supervisor_bridge behaviour

Bengt Kleberg bengt.kleberg@REDACTED
Wed May 6 15:06:43 CEST 2009


Another way of saying it could be:

Even if you have an already existing application, that is not using OTP
supervisors, you can still make it look like it is, if you ''hide'' it
under a supervisor_bridge.

Does that make it clearer?


On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Gamoto wrote:
> The documentation says to use this behaviour for:
> "a process which connects a subsystem not designed according to the OTP design principles to a supervision tree"
> Could you explain with other terms ?
> If the sub-system is a set of processus which listen tcp/ip sockets, must the supervisor be of this type ?
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list