Thu Mar 5 20:36:59 CET 2009
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Joe Armstrong <erlang@REDACTED> wrote:
> I wrote the following a while back - it's a very simple implementation of
> what I think is a transactional memory - as far as I can see this mirrors
> what the hardware guys thinks is a transactional memory. It's just a simple
> generalization of the good 'ol test and set.
That was a very interesting read, thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions