Wed Jun 3 11:31:35 CEST 2009
Robert Virding wrote:
> 2009/6/3 mats cronqvist < <mailto:>>
> Alas, re wants strings, and there's not much I can do about that.
> Not quite true. The *underlying implementation* wants the regexp as a
> string but this does not mean that the user has to supply it as a
> string. You could very well allow the regexp as an AST (as well as?) and
> then internally convert it to a string.
This would be a nice addition at any rate.
It could well be offered as a library on top of re.
More information about the erlang-questions