[erlang-questions] Re: Unicast 20k messages, $500-$1000 bounty

Ulf Wiger <>
Fri Jul 17 12:39:16 CEST 2009


Joel Reymont wrote:

> Jim,
> 
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Jim Morris wrote:
> 
>> It is Socket programming 101 that writes can block when the TCP
>> receiver does not read and the flow control causes the TCP buffers to
>> backup.
> 
> This all makes sense. I will redo the code using just 1 middleman 
> process then.

You may want to consider the following passage from the inet man page
on setopts/2:

{delay_send, Boolean}
Normally, when an Erlang process sends to a socket, the driver will try 
to immediately send the data. If that fails, the driver will use any 
means available to queue up the message to be sent whenever the 
operating system says it can handle it. Setting {delay_send, true} will 
make all messages queue up. This makes the messages actually sent onto 
the network be larger but fewer. The option actually affects the 
scheduling of send requests versus Erlang processes instead of changing 
any real property of the socket. Needless to say it is an implementation 
specific option. Default is false.

I'm not sure if setting {delay_send, true} would have any beneficial
effect on your particular problem, but the text does shed some light
on the semantics of sending to a socket.

BR,
Ulf W
-- 
Ulf Wiger
CTO, Erlang Training & Consulting Ltd
http://www.erlang-consulting.com


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list