[erlang-questions] Re: Unicast 20k messages, $500-$1000 bounty
Thu Jul 16 17:47:23 CEST 2009
On Jul 16, 2009, at 4:35 PM, Paulo Sérgio Almeida wrote:
> I don't know what deliveery semantics you aim for, but now you don't
> have total order in message delivery even for the same topic. As the
> sending is in a spawned proc, two clients can receive two msgs A and
> B from the same topic one in the order A -> B and the other B -> A.
> As you already have middleman, why not do the sending without
> spawning a proc?
You are right, I'll fix this!
Mac hacker with a performance bent
More information about the erlang-questions