[erlang-questions] Re: Unicast 20k messages, $500-$1000 bounty

Joel Reymont joelr1@REDACTED
Thu Jul 16 17:35:55 CEST 2009


I'd like to introduce another useful constraint into the equation.

You must grab the timestamp _before_ you start broadcasting since what  
we are trying to measure is delivery time from the moment the message  
is published.

The time it takes for the message to travel through the server and  
into pubsub:publish is rather small and can be ignored but resetting  
the timestamp before sending the message to each client both skews the  
timings and does not measure "time from publishing".

With that in mind, here's my latest set of Mac timings: 2s, 2.2s and  
2.3s for 20k messages, with the starting time captured before  
broadcasting [1].

I traded the time taken to broadcast to a list over the time and  
effort taken to subscribe and unsubscribe. Setup time is much longer  
now since inserting, deleting and searching a tuple list of 20k items  
is garbage collection galore. Traversal time of 617.352ms, 645.084ms,  
871.228ms and 697.16ms beats anything we have seen from ETS so far and  
I'm only looking at a maximum of 20k subscribers per server.

I think it's better to build the list over time than to build it from  
ets at broadcasting time.

	Thanks, Joel

[1] http://github.com/tinycode/janus/commit/19c3cc954fdbc5ecb7c950510a80f56423ab9ec9

---

(debug@REDACTED)3> bot:test(flashbot, 20000).

=INFO REPORT==== 16-Jul-2009::16:10:26 ===
setup: 154206.92ms, good: 20000, bad: 0, run: 157926.75ms
     2.4990ms | min
   500.0000ms | 2359   -  11.79%
  1000.0000ms | 6323   -  31.61%
  1500.0000ms | 4934   -  24.67%
  2000.0000ms | 5769   -  28.84%
  2500.0000ms | 615    -   3.08%
  2078.7770ms | max
ok
(debug@REDACTED)4> bot:test(flashbot, 20000).

=INFO REPORT==== 16-Jul-2009::16:16:36 ===
setup: 150305.92ms, good: 20000, bad: 0, run: 154186.14ms
     2.1070ms | min
   500.0000ms | 2235   -  11.18%
  1000.0000ms | 4840   -  24.20%
  1500.0000ms | 5497   -  27.48%
  2000.0000ms | 5283   -  26.41%
  2500.0000ms | 2145   -  10.72%
  2185.3810ms | max
ok
(debug@REDACTED)5> bot:test(flashbot, 20000).

=INFO REPORT==== 16-Jul-2009::16:22:07 ===
setup: 201656.95ms, good: 20000, bad: 0, run: 205959.23ms
     2.5690ms | min
   500.0000ms | 2573   -  12.86%
  1000.0000ms | 2704   -  13.52%
  1500.0000ms | 5835   -  29.18%
  2000.0000ms | 5527   -  27.63%
  2500.0000ms | 3361   -  16.80%
  2371.7610ms | max
ok

(debug@REDACTED)6> bot:test(flashbot, 20000).

=INFO REPORT==== 16-Jul-2009::16:29:57 ===
setup: 153129.67ms, good: 20000, bad: 0, run: 157174.14ms
     3.4600ms | min
   500.0000ms | 2682   -  13.41%
  1000.0000ms | 3922   -  19.61%
  1500.0000ms | 5523   -  27.62%
  2000.0000ms | 4728   -  23.64%
  2500.0000ms | 3145   -  15.72%
  2295.7770ms | max
ok

---
Mac hacker with a performance bent
http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list