[erlang-questions] Re: ets traversal time

Joel Reymont joelr1@REDACTED
Thu Jul 16 13:03:08 CEST 2009

On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:45 AM, ttmrichter@REDACTED wrote:

> I am. The first one is taking a little under 10% less time and the  
> second one over 50% less time over the original foldr version. This  
> isn't much of a difference?

You are right. I was hoping to see a drastic difference, though. That  
original 2s is more of an outlier.

Mac hacker with a performance bent

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list