[erlang-questions] 20k messages in 4s but want to go faster!

[Johnny Billquist]

 From a performance point of view, yes. Definitely. UDP will give so 
much more throughput.
However, it then also becomes a question of what he thinks of lost packets?

	Johnny

Valentin Micic wrote:
> Maybe it's a time for Joel to consider switching to UDP.
> 
> V.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: erlang-questions@REDACTED [mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED] On
> Behalf Of Matthew Sackman
> Sent: 10 July 2009 08:52 PM
> To: Joel Reymont
> Cc: Erlang Users' List
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] 20k messages in 4s but want to go faster!
> 
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:48:55PM +0100, Joel Reymont wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Matthew Sackman wrote:
>> My messages are just 69 bytes and each goes to a different socket.
> 
> Ahh, sorry, hadn't realised you have a different socket for each
> message. Not sure if it can be done. Certainly RabbitMQ can receive,
> route and deliver 25k msgs/sec which are all > 69 bytes, but that's with
> one socket in and one socket out. I don't have any further ideas for
> you, sorry.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
> 


-- 
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                   ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@REDACTED             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol