[erlang-questions] Mumps M/DB and M/DBX

Andrew buricchio@REDACTED
Sun Jul 5 00:04:06 CEST 2009

MUMPS is very powerful. We use it in conjunction with Erlang. 
Architecture is {Web application -> Erlang middleware -> MUMPS}. In 
fact, we use MUMPS from Intersystems Cache DB, but it is quite the same 
as GT.M. I can't remember any cons, it really save much time for us. 
Both MUMPS (especially Cache) and Erlang complement each other quite 
well. Perhaps, you have more concrete questions?


Kunthar wrote:
> I'd really appreciated to get pros and cons, if anyone used before
> those DB types.
> What you think about GT.M and extended clone of M/DB?
> http://www.mgateway.com/
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mdb-community-forum
> http://www.fidelityinfoservices.com/FNFIS/Markets/NonfinancialIndustries/Healthcare/gtm/
> Peace
> \|/ Kunth
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list