[erlang-questions] I Hate Unit Testing...
Wed Jan 28 15:30:46 CET 2009
Maybe I'm even lazier, but I just write my tests in the same file as
the module under test, so then the boilerplate is (within the file
you're testing, and therefore already compiling):
So then, when you re-compile the module, instead of, well, whatever
else you were doing, just do:
[If putting tests in that same module is somehow Wrong And Terrible,
world, please let me know why... ]
In addition, eunit's ?debugVal() macro is incredibly useful -- it's
like the keystroke-friendly print stmt that Erlang doesn't have. In
other words, one of your tests fail -- want to look at what's going on
inside the middle of a function somewhere? Just wrap a line in ?
debugVal() and you get a *great* info message, with full line number
and everything. It's so useful I sometimes -include eunit just to get
access to that during my dev process.
Just my $.02 as a test-obsessed programmer: eunit is as impressively
close to the ideal of As Simple As Possible as anything I've ever seen.
(Speaking of which, Richard, eunit is absolutely the bomb -- I adore
On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Steve Davis wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> Thanks very much for your thoughts.
> Richard Carlsson wrote:
> Honesty is always at the heart of the most useful feedback!
>> simplest possible use of eunit for the terminally lazy...
> I've used JUnit and NUnit and indeed EUnit too. The real issue is "how
> much" I use them... or don't. All these frameworks are super-powerful
> and well featured BUT they all require coding (including Quviq's
> That *is the barrier* to me (and apparently most coders) bothering
> unit tests when stuck in the heat of things.
> I really am that lazy (or maybe just that stupid) that I don't want to
> change gear into writing (and debugging) a test module. Even when I do
> actually pull my finger out, I generally delay doing it by which
> time I
> have forgotten half of what the module was really intended to do (i.e.
> the detail of the spec), and so I have to remember all that and it
> becomes a big chore.
> OTOH, I *may* be bothered to add to a text file:
> hex(4) = "4"
> But from experience, I know that I'll just not bother to write:
> my_test() ->
> "4" = hex(4),
> On another note, someone mentioned Cucumber... well hmmph. That's all
> very nice for your corporate stakeholders, but it's waaaaayyy too
> verbose for any developer I know to be bothered with.
> With respect,
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions