[erlang-questions] UBF

[Steve Davis]

On Jan 16, 4:39 am, "Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)" <ulf.wi...@REDACTED>
wrote:
> I also wrote a small contract-to-hrl generator, so
> that I could specify the messages in UBF and refer
> to the resulting records in the code. This allowed
> me to write callbacks that simply matched on the
> record pattern, since I could trust that UBF had
> both parsed the data for me, and verified that the
> types and context were ok.

What a truly **excellent** idea!

> - UBF doesn't support much in terms of asynchronous
>    communication.

Was the facility provided by EVENT too limiting in some way?

Thanks to all for sharing your experiences. This makes fascinating
reading (for me at least!).

regs,
/s