Fri Jan 16 13:27:04 CET 2009
On Jan 16, 4:39 am, "Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)" <ulf.wi...@REDACTED>
> I also wrote a small contract-to-hrl generator, so
> that I could specify the messages in UBF and refer
> to the resulting records in the code. This allowed
> me to write callbacks that simply matched on the
> record pattern, since I could trust that UBF had
> both parsed the data for me, and verified that the
> types and context were ok.
What a truly **excellent** idea!
> - UBF doesn't support much in terms of asynchronous
Was the facility provided by EVENT too limiting in some way?
Thanks to all for sharing your experiences. This makes fascinating
reading (for me at least!).
More information about the erlang-questions