[erlang-questions] arity part of function name and variadic functions

Andras Georgy Bekes bekesa@REDACTED
Wed Feb 25 18:35:14 CET 2009

Robert Virding wrote:
> Yes, that is exactly what happened, it was "inherited" from Prolog.
> Along with a lot of things apart from the syntax.
If Erlang inherited the syntax of prolog, you would not need to develop 

Off: The operator-notation and the functor-concept of Prolog has all the 
advantages of LISP's syntax (i.e. code=data), but makes the code look 
nice. IMHO a language with all the power of LISP, plus Prolog's 
operator syntax plus Erlang-style concurrency would be great alloy. 


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list