[erlang-questions] The Beauty of Erlang Syntax
Wed Feb 25 15:06:59 CET 2009
"Michael T. Richter" <> writes:
> If functional programming makes
> more sense to beginners, if imperative programming is so counter-intuitive, so
> difficult and so prone to failure (and I will agree 100% with that last
> point), how did it become the dominant paradigm for pretty much all of
> computing's existence?
If you start with bare metal, and require that each langue generation
adds a minimum of abstraction, you'll get somthing like this:
Machine Code -> Assembly -> FORTRAN -> C -> C++ -> Java
If your new language is too different from the current king of the
hill, it will not be adapted.
Extrapolating on this, I hereby predict the NextNextBigLanguage(*)
will be something like clojure.
More information about the erlang-questions