Mon Feb 2 23:59:02 CET 2009
funny thing, according to  I guess, that RabbitMQ itself using built-in
Kevin A. Smith-2 wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Lev Walkin wrote:
>>> Also, I heard that some high profile projects do not use
>>> distribution at
>>> all, replacing it with custom RPC mechanism like . Is there are
>>> reasons beside security for this?
>> Beside security, I heard of another reason: not being sure about
>> performance, scalability and reliability properties of standard
>> internode communication. In my view, using AMQP should be more natural
>> next step than rolling out custom RPC in such case (if security is not
>> the primary concern of going away from native RPC).
> A random AMQP comment: I'm using RabbitMQ on a project with demanding
> performance requirements. After just a few days of use with hardly any
> tweaking or optimization we're seeing message rates of 10-12k per
> second on a developer laptop with Erlang and Java AMQP clients. We
> expect this rate to increase when we get closer to deploy time after
> we've optimized our code and have access to server-class machines.
> erlang-questions mailing list
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shortnames-tp21789500p21800189.html
Sent from the Erlang Questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the erlang-questions