[erlang-questions] Re: Emacs as Erlang IDE for newbies
Wed Dec 23 21:29:20 CET 2009
> 2009/12/23 Michael Turner <>
>> Why should a newbie be fine with just a syntax-highlighting editor?
>> do need more help from tools, not less. I maintain that an easy way to
>> compile and run projects and a source-level debugger are vital.
>> I'm starting to think that's the best choice for now -- no need to call
>> it an editor, just say "here's a program that helps you write, change
>> and run Erlang programs."
> Bravo! That would be a smart move ;-)
> Indeed, who cares about editors? They just need "a program that helps /them/
> write, change
> and run Erlang programs."
> On the face of it, Wrangler might seem a strange choice -- for, surely,
>> refactoring tools are for Real Programmers? But maybe not. Maybe
>> beginners should have them at the beginning. Some common refactorings
>> are very simple, like "change this function name everywhere." I wish
>> I'd had that when I was starting out.
>> As for Flymake, I really don't buy this idea that syntax error messages
>> from the Erlang shell are now adequately clear. Hardly a day goes by
>> that I don't have to peel myself off the ceiling, shouting, "'Syntax
>> error before: &'?! Be specific!" I want to know more.
>> And so will noobs.
> That's not a wrong thought.
> I've suggested Emacs because, besides its uncluttered interface, you could
> tailor its configuration and its packages' ones to suit your needs, exposing
> as much functionality as you wish.
Could someone inform a not-quite-noob (I'll have more thoughts on all of
this when I've finished my ****** marking of final exams) let me know
where to find flymake and wrangler; this is the first I've heard of
either and they sound very interesting.
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened
|phone: +1 250 370 4452 | Hermann
More information about the erlang-questions