NIF wishes
Hans Nilsson R
hans.r.nilsson@REDACTED
Tue Dec 8 17:50:12 CET 2009
I have been playing with the NIF facility in R13B03 and I have some
comments. The implementation is very stable, as usual with experimental
code from Erlang/OTP! And very fast....
I have a large binary which I pass into a nif, which processes a part of
it and returns the result and the unprocessed part of the binary. The
unprocessed part is then input to the nif again and so on.
Wish 1:
Now, in the nif, to make a copy of the unprocessed part and make a new
binary is time consuming, so some function enif_make_sub_binary(env,
bin, from, to) would be useful.
Wish 2:
When the nif shall return a part of the binary as a string or a binary,
the functions enif_make_atom and enif_make_string assumes that the part
is zero-terminated. It is of course possible to save the character,
write a zero, call the enif-function and then write back the original
character, but it is of course dangerous to modify in place in a
binary... The alternative of copying the characters to a buffer is slow.
Therefore I'd like to have some enif_make_string_n(env, char *p, int
length) as well, analogous to the c-library functions strcpy and strncpy.
/Hans Nilsson
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list