[erlang-questions] Best practice for defining functions with edoc,erlc,eunit and the dialyzer

Dmitry Belyaev <>
Wed Dec 2 16:16:02 CET 2009


And this could lead us to interactive documentation like in python.
That would be great!

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 08:55 -0600, Brentley Jones wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:08 AM, Frank Mueller wrote:
> 
> >>    3) Does anything else have to be fixed?
> > 
> > I'm not happy with the mixed notation in comments or using -spec. So it should be @spec in a
> > comment or -doc handled like -spec.
> 
> I also agree here. I would prefer that I could write everything in a module attribute style. Then
> edoc, and other programs, could read the attribute instead of parsing the file.
> 
> - Brentley Jones
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
> 
> 




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list