[erlang-questions] Concurrent processes on multi-core platforms with lots of chatter
Tue Dec 1 17:32:35 CET 2009
2009/12/1 Jayson Vantuyl <>
> Wait, am I confusing process groups with group_leaders? Are those the
> same? Even if they aren't, I still don't like repurposing pg or creating a
> new API.
I mean the built-in process groups which you access with the
group_leader/0/1 BIFs and *NOT* the process groups as defined using the
modules pg or pg2. There is an unfortunate name clash here by pg and pg2.
More information about the erlang-questions