[erlang-questions] Problems with ibrowse 1.5.2 - send_req not causing stream_to

[Chandru]

Hi Vik,

Could you please turn on ibrowse tracing and post the trace messages? It'll
help in debugging.

cheers
Chandru

2009/8/26 Vik Olliver <vik@REDACTED>

> Hi folks. Stillhaving trouble with ibrowse. I'm calling:
>
> ibrowse:send_req(Url, [],
>                         get, [],
>                         [{stream_to, self()},{max_pipeline_size,1}])
>
> to fetch 16 URLs in parallel. Now I have not changed the default sessions,
> so presumably it sits at 10.
>
> When the 5th URL GET is issued, no error is generated (I know this because
> I get {ibrowse_req_id, Ref} back) but no end_deliver/3 or end_deliver/4 is
> returned to self(). The same happens to the next 5 GETs.
>
> Curiously, the apache server on the other end of the GET request actually
> receives the 5th GET, and responds OK. The apache server is configured with
> 5 sessions.
>
> The apache server has been deliberately slowed down so that there is a 2
> sec delay before the response is issued. Consequently, none of the other
> GETs return an end_deliver  - the first actual OK is not seen by ERMS until
> after 16 URL GETs have gone out.
>
> Yes, we are deliberately overloading the apache server - to see what
> ibrowse does. Is there some error hook or similar that I should be catching
> to indicate a terminated ReqID, or should I be expecting {error, reason}
> from send_req/5? At the moment I get neither.
>
> Vik :v)
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
>
>