[erlang-questions] Controlled interaction of two erlang distributed networks
Jayson Vantuyl
kagato@REDACTED
Wed Aug 26 08:34:37 CEST 2009
One more note. You may also need to use the option "-connect_all
false". It keeps from having the nodes automatically connect to all
of the nodes that a partner is connected to. I always forget about
that one.
On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Richard Andrews wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jayson Vantuyl<kagato@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>> You might ask why I wouldn't just monkey with Distributed Erlang to
>> separate
>> the globals into groups (see the global_group module). The problem
>> is that
>> Distributed Erlang still just isn't built for this sort of use-
>> case. In
>> Distributed Erlang getting the SSL stuff working right is hard,
>> firewalls
>> suck, NAT sucks even more, and the proper DNS setup is more trouble
>> than
>> maintaining a node-list ever was (and impossible to quickly fix, if
>> you use
>> high enough TTLs).
>
> Security, NAT, etc. is a non-issue as any non-LAN traffic travels via
> IPSec between sites. Do you think this modifies your suggestions?
--
Jayson Vantuyl
kagato@REDACTED
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list