Nested for-loops, there has to be a better way to do this

[Steve Davis]

No need to wonder. Have a read about fprof:apply.

http://erlang.org/doc/man/fprof.html

On Aug 3, 8:51 pm, "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogate...@REDACTED>
wrote:
> Cool.  But I do wonder, what are the performance hits compared to one
> larger function?  Reversing lists, returning values, etc.  That's one
> of the reasons why I made the 'monolithic' function that I did.