[erlang-questions] Clustering through Multicast

[chaitanya Chalasani]

Thank you for the link. I will run through the pasox protocol
documentation.

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:55 +0200, Hynek Vychodil wrote:

> It sounds more like paxos protocol works. Look at scalaris
> (http://code.google.com/p/scalaris/).
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:17 AM, chaitanya Chalasani
> <chaitanya.chalasani@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
>         Hi,
>         
>         May be the solution exists, but the idea just popped and want
>         to clarify if it really works this way.
>         
>         Instead of the regular cluster node and unicast load balance
>         to multiple worker nodes, if we use the IP multicast to a
>         group of servers with replicated mnesia and let each node
>         attempt to start a transaction and only one node gets to act
>         on it, based on the mnesia transaction write lock, will there
>         be less latency in distributing the transactions. And also it
>         might help in some cases wherein the delay in identifying dead
>         node would not effect the transactions within.  
>         ------
>         CHAITANYA CHALASANI
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         erlang-questions mailing list
>         erlang-questions@REDACTED
>         http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
> 
> Analyze your data in minutes. Share your insights instantly. Thrill
> your boss.  Be a data hero!
> Try Good Data now for free: www.gooddata.com

------
CHAITANYA CHALASANI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20090423/02bbe209/attachment.htm>