[erlang-questions] The Erlang Rationale

Tim Fletcher <>
Tue Sep 30 11:35:36 CEST 2008

> It is to be considered to be work-in-progress and I will add to it when I
> find the time and get the urge. Please come with comments and suggestions on
> what is there and what you feel should be there.

Interesting read, thanks. Didn't know the JCL stuff existed. More
about code upgrading ("Continuous evolution of the system") would be
good. And what was the original motivation for strings as lists?

Thanks kev/t for the PDFs.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list