[erlang-questions] Parallel Shootout & a style question
Fri Sep 5 08:18:42 CEST 2008
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe <> wrote:
> I am all for automatic parallelisation, AS LONG AS IT WORKS.
> I am going to keep on repeating my basic point until it
> sinks in: Erlang processes have side effects, and changing
> from sequential map to parallel map changes the meaning of
> the program.
> Automatic parallelisation is good for PURE functional
> code. When we have something that can reliably detect
> chunks of Erlang code that are pure, let's go for it!
> Till then, beware...
Every minute is to be grasped.
Time waits for nobody.
-- Inscription on a Zen Gong
More information about the erlang-questions