[erlang-questions] Types and specs [WAS: [enhancement] string:split/2]
Fri Oct 31 12:32:27 CET 2008
Matthias Lang wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 14, Kostis Sagonas wrote:
>> (If you want to specify an improper list the closer you can get is to
>> employ the long and yucky type maybe_improper_list()
> cons_cell() would have been a more appetising name.
It used to be called cons_or_nil() once upon a time, then it became
possibly_improper_list() and ended up in maybe_improper_list().
The corresponding type to cons_cell() is the even nicer
I agree that the names are too verbose, I'm not even sure anymore how it
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions