[erlang-questions] Why isn't erlang strongly typed?

Steve Davis <>
Wed Oct 22 23:12:45 CEST 2008



On Oct 22, 9:51 am, Kevin Scaldeferri <> wrote:

> You don't have to "accept Ulf's definition".  

Well, that's true. There are many other definitions that I could
choose to accept.

...but I'm not at all sure that this would mean I am in the least
confused about/between strong typing and static typing (or their
relevance to my question).

/s




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list