[erlang-questions] Finding inconsistencies in record definitions and pretty printing records
Thu Oct 16 00:37:27 CEST 2008
I imagine that I must have misunderstood,
but this scheme seems designed to prevent hot loading.
If I need to add a field to a -record declaration and
reload the module in question, it looks as though the
"conflict" will be detected and prevented.
I've also failed to understand how the system copes
with two independently developed and unrelated modules
having a record with the same name and different
More information about the erlang-questions