[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?

[Edwin Fine]

I'm sure your code is great; it's a specific solution in erlang.el that's
admittedly a kluge (kludge). I refer specifically to the following comment:

;; Warning, the function `erlang-man-function' is a hack!
;; It links itself into the man code in a non-clean way.  I have
;; chosen to keep it since it provides a very useful functionality
;; which is not possible to achieve using a clean approach.
;;   / AndersL


On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:34 PM, mats cronqvist <masse@REDACTED> wrote:

> "Edwin Fine" <erlang-questions_efine@REDACTED> writes:
>
> > (I know there is a kluged up one in Emacs, but how about one that
> > works across the board, not only in Emacs?).
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kludge (sic); "a clumsy or inelegant
> solution to a problem"
>
>  just for the record; the emacs/distel solution is possibly the most
>  elegant erlang code written this millenium. at least by me :>
>
>  mats
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20081117/bb533688/attachment.htm>