[erlang-questions] Erlang 3000?
Sun Nov 16 19:45:28 CET 2008
On Nov 16, 2008, at 9:25 AM, damien morton wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Robert Virding <>
> Syntax is another problem, maybe practically even more difficult,
> but in one respect actually not too difficult. The main point is
> that the syntax and the semantics must "fit together" and support
> each other. This is one reason why I am not too keen on using a C/
> Java like syntax, it was designed for completely different semantics.
> More thoughts later,
> Another correspondent pointed out that the scope of the changes in
> Perl 6 is provoking Shock and Awe is some of Perl community - the
> changes are so extensive that the language is barely recognisable.
Did someone say that? Because I don't think I said that...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions