[erlang-questions] conditional expressions

damien morton dmorton@REDACTED
Sat Nov 15 16:09:43 CET 2008

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Richard Carlsson <richardc@REDACTED> wrote:

> damien morton wrote:
>>  Still, what strikes me about the erlang libraries is the tremendous
>> variety of techniques used to signal the return of a value or not.
>> Sometimes nil/Value, sometimes false/Value, sometimes []/[Value],
>> sometimes false/{value,Value}
> I've tried to promote {value,X}/none as a standard maybe-type, but it's
> hard to do much about all the existing code out there.
>  For a function that can return 0 or 1 answers, I personally like the
>> []/[Value] approach.
> []/[X] is ok for "searches" as in mnesia, where in some cases you can
> get several elements as a result, but as a general mechanism it always
> makes a reader think "so, can I ever get more than one value here?", so
> it's not good for clarity.

Would {}/{X} be more clear for 0 or 1 answers, and []/[...] for 0 or more

Not too keen on the none/{value,Value} approach - it feels irregular
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20081116/d4c653e9/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list