[erlang-questions] is this try expression idiom common?
Tue Nov 11 22:54:44 CET 2008
"Kevin" <q2h46uw02@REDACTED> writes:
> I guess this creative formatting of
> try a(), b(), c()
> throw:_ -> something_failed
> To me this is a completely different idiom, absolutely nothing like a
> case expression, and opens erlang up to a more exception based control
> flow and error handling. Is this legit? Frowned upon? I searched the
> pragmatic book and there is not a single example of this.
i do this all the time;
catch _:R -> oops(R)
excellent style, imo :>
More information about the erlang-questions