[erlang-questions] erlang sucks
Erik Reitsma
erik.reitsma@REDACTED
Thu Mar 13 09:05:46 CET 2008
If you count libraries: after rewriting a GUI from iv to tcl I gave up
when tcl was removed. I guess gs has been around long enough to consider
it, but then again there are still GUI alternatives floating around, and
I am afraid they will become better than gs and gs will be replaced.
*Erik.
> Out of interest:
> Does anybody know of _anything_ that has been removed, ever?
>
>
> bengt
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:53 +0100, Mats Cronqvist wrote:
> > Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Mats Cronqvist
> > > <mats.cronqvist@REDACTED
> <mailto:mats.cronqvist@REDACTED>> wrote:
> > >
> > > or are you saying there is a need for several
> 'and'? in that case i
> > > disagree.
> > >
> > > ...
> > > I think there is no way to change it, because if you
> remove 'andalso'
> > > and use 'and' in programmers manner lazy behaviour, you
> will break
> > > some legacy code a vice versa. This change is impossible.
> You can be
> > > not agree with it. You can argue against it, but it is
> all what you
> > > can do with it.
> > if you go back a few posts, you'll see that i try to make it very
> > clear that nothing will be removed (at least not for the
> next few years).
> >
> > mats
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list