[erlang-questions] EEP9 new version

Fredrik Svahn fredrik.svahn@REDACTED
Wed Mar 12 08:27:26 CET 2008


I seem to have slipped on the keyboard when writing the mail.

binary_string it is.

BR /Fredrik

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Bengt Kleberg
<bengt.kleberg@REDACTED> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>  The existing module is called 'string' (not strings). Perhaps you do
>  want binary_string but mistyped it as binary_strings below?
>
>
>  bengt
>
>
>
>  On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 20:30 +0100, Fredrik Svahn wrote:
>  > A new version of EEP9 is available.
>  >
>  > In this version I have split the functionality into three parts as per
>  > popular demand. A binary_strings module (interface compatible with
>  > strings, although some extras added), a binary module (for non-string
>  > binaries) and a regexp module (yet to be named, for backwards
>  > compatibility it will probably need to exist in parallel with the
>  > old).
>  >
>  > http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0009.html
>  >
>  > I am also hoping that someone is willing to step up and take the lead
>  > for an EEP on unicode support as I believe this is to big to be in
>  > this eep. Better many small EEPs than one huge.
>  >
>  > BR /Fredrik
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > erlang-questions mailing list
>  > erlang-questions@REDACTED
>  > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  erlang-questions mailing list
>  erlang-questions@REDACTED
>  http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list