[erlang-questions] [clarify] edoc: using @spec tag for a fun type

Richard Carlsson <>
Mon Jun 30 09:25:46 CEST 2008

Csaba Hoch wrote:
> if I define a fun type with @type, can I use
> it when I define a function with @spec?
> I mean something like this:
> %% @type number_fun = ((number()) -> number()).
> %% @spec f = number_fun()
> f(X) ->
>     2*X.
> But my version doesn't work.
> Is it possible to do something similar?

No, this is currently not possible. I have made a note of this and will
consider adding it in the future. Thanks.


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list