[erlang-questions] clueless performance question
Fri Jun 13 10:37:16 CEST 2008
So the factor was on the number of processes used, not the resulting
reliability. Interesting point of view.
That makes me wonder where you applied the factor on for the Wide Finder
problem. Lines of code?
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 09:38 +0200, Mats Cronqvist wrote:
> Bengt Kleberg wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > The numbers I have seen for Erlang (on AXD301) is nine nines. Would not
> > "factor of 10" mean that the perl phone switch ''only'' have to reach
> > eight nines?
> > bengt
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:20 +0200, Mats Cronqvist wrote:
> >> kind of like implementing a phone switch with 10,000 concurrent tasks
> >> and get nine nines reliability in perl.
> no, any old Erlang system can handle 100,000 concurrent tasks.
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions