[erlang-questions] clueless performance question
Wed Jun 11 18:42:04 CEST 2008
On Jun 11, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> What I can write about WF1 is, this was a little bit ... well I
> write it clearly: "stupid" because WF1 was measured with data file
> cached. It is why this Perl implementation won. This implementation
> mmap file and than forked processes around this file and then rush.
> Each process reads it's mmap forked copy which in normal cause
> random access to disk and must end with far slowest solution.
I don't think it can really be considered cheating to take advantage
of features provided by the OS.
More information about the erlang-questions