[erlang-questions] Are you using {packet, http} ?
Paulo Sérgio Almeida
psa@REDACTED
Fri Jul 18 17:59:25 CEST 2008
Hi,
Sverker Eriksson wrote:
> I suppose you mean to return the same http-tuples but with binaries
> instead of lists for the string values.
Yes.
> One problem here is backward compatibility (again). At least Yaws is
> already using the combination [binary,{packet,http}]. We could of course
Looks like it is in just a couple of places. In the others it uses plain
{packet, http} without binary, or it uses binary in others after
switching to raw or line mode. It should be simple to change. But
perhaps Claes can answer that.
> argue our right to change an undocumented feature, but is it worth it?
The point is that I think having the possibility is useful. And if we
are to fix it, it is now (that it is becoming official) or never.
Regards,
Paulo
> Maybe a new {packet, http_bin} is a future solution even though using
> the binary option could be more elegant.
>
>
> /Sverker, Erlang/OTP Ericsson
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list