[erlang-questions] Is erlang-questions setting Reply-To properly?

[Dmitrii Dimandt]

On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:05 PM, Alain O'Dea wrote:

> Interesting article. Thank you Lev. I had not realized the side-
> effects were so severe, but upon review they make perfect sense. I
> will use Reply All and maybe even get at the admins of other lists to
> remove this reply-to munging.
>


Also try these:

Reply-to considered useful:
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml

Reply-to still considered harmful, really:
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html


:)




> On 10-Jul-08, at 10:59 PM, Lev Walkin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>
>>
>> Alain O'Dea wrote:
>>> It looks like the list-serv for erlang-questions is leaving Reply-
>>> To  blank instead of setting or overriding it to be "erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> " as I would expect. This has lead me on multiple occasions to
>>> reply  to the poster directly instead of replying to the thread. I
>>> find it  very confusing.
>>> Is erlang-questions setting Reply-To properly?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions