[erlang-questions] Reference counting instead of GC?
Fri Jul 4 00:03:44 CEST 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 17:47 +0200, Hynek Vychodil wrote:
> Message don't copy for example Termite (http://toute.ca/) and this is
> of course faster for big messages. But there is many good reasons why
> Erlang is as is.
>I don't believe change GC is good idea except you want just try it.
I didn't want to suggest replacing GC in the mainstream erlang.
However I have a feeling that the reference counting approach has some
considerable advantages in some _special_ applications, for example
* when an erlang(-like) system is operated on very low capacity
* for hard real time applications.
More information about the erlang-questions