[erlang-questions] Small Erlang VM
Thu Jul 3 18:52:58 CEST 2008
I understand why you would want to use Erlang, but instead of writing an
entire interpreter with all the complexity that entails, would you consider
using another language that is very good in extremely resource-restricted
environments? FORTH comes to mind. If you just want to Get Things Done, that
is; if you are constrained to use Erlang, that's a different matter.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Corrado Santoro <>
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Forget about BEAM, for a system this small you need to design
> > the entire compiler/VM/interpreter from scratch for small space.
> I was quite sure that I had to design the VM from scratch, but my idea
> was not to do the same for the compiler; I would like to start from the
> .beam file and write the interpreter, but, as far as I know, an official
> specification of .beam and of the instruction set does not exist.
> In any case, I'll follow your suggestions.
> Eng. Corrado Santoro, Ph.D.
> University of Catania - ITALY - Engineering Faculty
> Tel: +39 095 7382380 VoIP: sip:<sip%>
> Personal Home Page: http://www.diit.unict.it/users/csanto
> NUXI Home Page: http://nuxi.diit.unict.it
> erlang-questions mailing list
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate,
contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and
unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the
discomfort of thought.
John F. Kennedy 35th president of US 1961-1963 (1917 - 1963)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions