[erlang-questions] concurrency developments

Kirill Zaborski <>
Tue Jan 15 12:47:44 CET 2008


So you say that  performance doesn't matter?
Somewhat strange statement from engineer.

P.S. In some circumstances it can be negligible and I don't deny other
benefits from immutalbe variables. Just point to not very rare issues with
Java GC which could be solved in GC assuming immutable variables (which make
it simpler as far as I understand).

Regards,
Kirill.

On Jan 15, 2008 2:37 PM, Hynek Vychodil <> wrote:

> It isn't matter of performance, it is about security, reliability and
> bug hunting.
>
> On 1/15/08, Kirill Zaborski <> wrote:
> > And also normally better GC performance coming from immutable variables?
> Not
> > requiring intricate GC options.
> >
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2008 1:27 PM, Hynek Vychodil < >
> wrote:
> > >
> > > ... and where is immutable variables, where is side effect free
> > > functional programming? Where is funny declarative (easy readable)
> > > syntax?
> > >
> > > Groovy is death way.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/15/08, Christian S < > wrote:
> > > > Where are process links? Where are supervision tree infra-structure?
> > > > Where is remote-node messaging transparency?
> > > >
> > > > > http://www.groovyactors.org/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > 
> > > http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20080115/f0aa1f8c/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list