[erlang-questions] about fun vs. functions schisofrenia
Andras Georgy Bekes
Fri Jan 11 16:54:03 CET 2008
> A fun defined as fun Module:Function/Arity *will* survive code
> reloading. It has a different internal representation than a fun
> defined as fun Function/Arity.
Hmm, good to know!
This also means that you can have a fun Module:Function/Arity even
before loading Module, you'll have an error only when you call it.
1> (fun a:b/0).
2> catch (fun a:b/0)().
In this case there is really no reason to use the old
More information about the erlang-questions