[erlang-questions] Erlang concurrency

Serge Aleynikov <>
Fri Jan 11 12:56:04 CET 2008


I thought you dropped the word corollary for the nature of its 
bug-ridden spelling. ;-)

Robert Virding wrote:
> On 11/01/2008, Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt <> wrote:
>>  Robert Virding wrote:
>>
>> After reading the blogs about how good Erlang's concurrency model is and
>> how we just just made a super implementation of it in XXX I have been led to
>> formulate Virding's First Rule of Programming:
>>
>> Any sufficiently complicated concurrent program in another language
>> contains an ad hoc informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of
>> half of Erlang.
>>
>>  Sorry to disappoint you, but this has been done before :)
>>
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Erlang-for-desktop-applications--tp5673521p5962663.html
>>
> 
> Ah, but I don't define it as a corrolary! For me it's a new rule. :-)
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list