[erlang-questions] "Design patterns" for functional languages?
Thu Aug 7 22:39:10 CEST 2008
On Aug 7, 2008, at 21:38 , Darren New wrote:
> Sten Kvamme wrote:
>> Studying patterns and re-doing
>> other peoples solutions is downright boring.
> Also, one of the main points for the Design Patterns book is not
> just to
> show you the patterns but give them names.
Yes, good names are very important for source code understanding. And
anti-solutions with a name could also be helpful. Think about it, Cut
and Paste is an anti-pattern in any language not just in erlang. When
you catch yourself cutting and pasing -- from now on you will know
you are doing something bad ;-)
More information about the erlang-questions