[erlang-questions] Not an Erlang fan

Keith Irwin keith.irwin@REDACTED
Sun Sep 23 18:30:48 CEST 2007


On 9/23/07, Alex Alvarez <eajam@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> He definitely seems kind of bias at different points, but still it would
> be great to find out where he went wrong!
>

Isn't it that he's basing his whole analysis on file io, what's more, a
single file which doesn't lend itself to parallelism?  Had he started by
writing a client/server or p2p application around some domain other than
system-admin stuff, perhaps he'd be much more favorable towards the
multitude of strengths Erlang has to offer.

--Keith

-Alex
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:53:36 +0800
> > From: headspin@REDACTED
> > To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > Subject: [erlang-questions] Not an Erlang fan
> >
> > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/09/22/Erlang
> >
> > Tim Bray might raise some valid points here, even if he's slightly
> > biased by his background.
> >
> > --
> > Didier
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://www.erlang.org/mailman<http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
> /listinfo/erlang-questions<http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman<http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
> /listinfo/erlang-questions<http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20070923/3391e323/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list