[erlang-questions] Intel Quad CPUs

Damien Morton <>
Thu Sep 6 22:14:21 CEST 2007


+1 on less syntactic clutter.

The /2-ness of foo is clear from the remainder of the type specification

There are redundant parentheses too - are they neeed?

-spec(foo :: (integer, float) -> atom)

 just reads better to me
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Kostis Sagonas wrote:
>   
>> In the new language you would write (or preferably change the above edoc
>> comment to be):
>>
>> -spec(foo/2 :: ((integer(), float()) -> atom())).
>>     
>
> What is the reason for the trailing ()s? It would be nice if the syntax
> had less redundant visual noise.
>
> Tony.
>   




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list