[erlang-questions] Tilera 64-core chip - let's help them help us!
Thu Sep 6 12:33:42 CEST 2007
On 6 Sep 2007, at 03:59, Kip Macy wrote:
>> I'd offer the same suggestions to Intel; if they want to get their
>> core widely used, Erlang is the way to go, so support the
>> community !-)
> Its coming, but will be targeted largely at graphics.
> I meant to say "to start off with".
Targeting at graphics doesn't mean ignore Erlang.
Several things worth considering:
1. Tim Sweeney's POPL 2006 talk about the 'next language for game
I must be clear, much of that is about *statically* typed functional
languages, like Haskell, and not Erlang-style dynamic typing, but
part is also concerned with concurrency.
2. erlang-questions Digest, Vol 4, Issue 8, 4. Stand Alone Erlang or
Equivalent (Benjamin Tolputt)
I believe this is for the games industry.
3. NVIDIA and ATI are targeted on graphics, but they can see the
value of supporting other industries through CUDA and CTM. Both are
putting resources into non-graphic application areas.
A view of challenges for non-graphics uses for many-core chips comes
from "The view from Berkeley" http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/
and also http://view.eecs.berkeley.edu/wiki/Main_Page as relevant.
One key point for Berkeley is "To maximize programmer productivity,
programming models should be independent of the number of
processors.", which also seems to agree with Tim Sweeney, and is a
pretty good fit to Erlang.
Erlang is a practical tool available *now* which should map onto many
independent cores (which seems to be Tilera's architecture) better
than it maps onto e.g. NVIDIA 8800.
Providing it's a good fit , Tilera and Intel could broaden their
technologies appeal and usefulness, by helping the community port
Erlang. A good Erlang port could bring production-quality technology
with an outstanding reputation early in their products lifecycle.
IMHO, getting a book as good as Joe Armstrong's will take significant
time (which is precious right now for Tilera); it'd almost be worth
supporting an Erlang port just to leverage Joe's book and the new
interest in Erlang stimulated by it. Further, if Tilera can do it
right, they could cover there costs. Intel have benefits to gain from
a good Erlang port too, and HiPE may even work on the i80-core!
What's not to like?
More information about the erlang-questions