[erlang-questions] bit syntax slower than bit operations
Kirill Zaborski
qrilka@REDACTED
Sun Sep 2 11:12:56 CEST 2007
And when is R12B is planned for?
Best regards,
Kirill.
On 01 Sep 2007 23:45:52 +0200, Bjorn Gustavsson <bjorn@REDACTED>
wrote:
>
> Matthias Radestock <matthias@REDACTED> writes:
>
> >
> > Unfortunately, my tests indicate that the latter version is about twice
> > as fast, using R11B-5 under Linux on x86.
> >
> > Does the bit-syntax compilation produce rather inefficient code?
>
> Yes, it could be better.
>
> In fact, I managed to optimize the BEAM instruction for matching out
> an integer from a binary so that decode_compact/1 now runs somewhat
> faster than decode_verbose/1 on my computer (Sparc/Solaris).
> I hope to optimize construction of binaries in the same way.
>
> Those improvements will be included in R12B, as well as other improvements
> and optimizations of the bit syntax that we have been working on.
>
> Thanks for pointing out the problem.
>
> /Bjorn
> --
> Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20070902/962eec27/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list