[erlang-questions] 64-bit erlang

[Alex Arnon]

On Nov 28, 2007 11:02 AM, Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) <ulf.wiger@REDACTED> wrote:
...

>
> How about using 32-bit words inside the process heap, and
> "far pointers" to any off-heap data (including other
> processes)?
>
...

* runs away to the hills *

How insensitive - not everyone has recovered from 16-bit x86 assembly
terminology :)

But seriously - I this would make sense.
Will this allow Mnesia/{d}ets tables to be unlimited then?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20071128/d7efa3db/attachment.htm>