[erlang-questions] My biggest beef with Erlang
Wed Nov 28 08:56:49 CET 2007
R6RS is available at http://www.r6rs.org . i think it includes a module
system hidden under the heading ''libraries''.
Those were the days...
EPO guidelines 1978: "If the contribution to the known art resides
solely in a computer program then the subject matter is not
patentable in whatever manner it may be presented in the claims."
On 11/28/07 06:02, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2007, at 10:32 am, Robert Virding wrote:
>> Scheme allows defining a prefix within the a symbol which means it
>> refers to another module (library for them) so you would write:
> There is no such thing as a module in Scheme (up to R5RS; they were
> a module system for R6RS but I haven't kept up with that) and Scheme
> up to R5RS) attaches no special significance to colons.
> That's Common Lisp.
> Note that Common Lisp doesn't put *functions* in modules, it puts
> *symbols* (atoms) in packages. Package prefix "syntax" in Common
> Lisp is
> entirely lexical, there is no such thing as ((find-a-module):some-
> function ...)
> in that form. (You can do it, you just can't do it using colons.)
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions